iris
4370c467ca
A fresh install wrote a `claude-cli` provider into the local setup unconditionally. Nothing looked for `claude`; the list was hardcoded in `Config::seed`, so on any machine without it -- which is every machine but the dev VM -- the phone was offered a provider that cannot spawn, stated with exactly the confidence of one that had been checked. Discovery already existed and was already right: `setups::discover` probes with `command -v` over the transport, includes echo for the local one because it runs in-process, and records the resolved path rather than the bare name. Only the local setup skipped it, which is the one place the answer felt obvious enough not to ask. So `seed` now takes the providers it is given, and seeding asks this machine the same question it asks any other. It moved out of `SessionManager::new` into an awaited step in main, because asking is I/O and a constructor that quietly spawns a subprocess surprises every caller. A discovery that fails seeds `echo` alone and says so, since echo is true wherever this server runs -- falling back to the hardcoded list would be the same bug with an extra step. The test that covered this agreed with the bug, because both were written from the same assumption: it asserted the seed contains `claude-cli`. It now asserts the opposite -- that the seed invents nothing -- and the session tests seed echo explicitly rather than relying on a constructor that would make them pass or fail on whether `claude` happens to be installed on whoever runs them. Verified by running a server on a PATH holding only `sh`: it seeds `echo` alone. With claude and llama-server present it finds both. 34 tests.