Hand a redrawn widget the mask it inherited, not its own

`ActiveData::mask` is the mask a widget's drawing is clipped to, which is
either one it set itself or the one it inherited. `redraw` passed it back as
the *inherited* mask, so a `Masked` widget settled on its own was handed its
own mask and `set_mask` asserted -- a panic on any local redraw of one, for
as long as there has been a local-redraw path. The two are separate facts, so
`parent_mask` keeps the second.

That also states the question `remap_subtree` was asking. It compared a
widget's mask with the one threaded down from its parent to find out whether
the widget owned it; the comparison is now between the two fields on the
widget, which is the same question asked where the answer lives, and the
parameter goes.

Checked: fmt, clippy, 87 suite tests including the new one, which panics
without this; 18 core unit tests; the release oracle at 100 seeds; the
fifteen shrinker cases at 400 seeds of depth 5; and `tabs` renders
byte-identical at 1920x1200.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

core/src/ui/active.rs

@@ -58,7 +58,14 @@ pub struct ActiveData {
     pub own_align: RegionAlign,
     /// The movable region whose coordinates `region` uses.
     pub parent_move: MoveIdx,
+    /// The mask its drawing is clipped to: one it set itself, or the one it
+    /// inherited from whoever drew it.
     pub mask: MaskIdx,
+    /// That inherited one. The two differ exactly where the widget set a
+    /// mask of its own, which is the one it owns and the one a move rewrites
+    /// -- and the one a redraw of it must not be handed back, since setting
+    /// a mask asserts there is none.
+    pub parent_mask: MaskIdx,
     pub layer: LayerId,
 }