A row per finished background task is a screenful of dividers about work the reader was not asking after, and one of them turned out to be a whole shell command drawn as centred prose, because its words came from somewhere with no reason to keep them short. `Event::TaskNote` is gone entirely, along with the row that drew it. A subagent's closing report is recorded as that subagent's own transcript's closing text and is read in the subcard, which is where it was already going; what the parent gets a row for is a message a subagent genuinely sends it, which arrives by the peer path and has had one all along. What remains is the actual defect and the smallest thing that fixes it. The fold still refuses to grow a settled reply, so a turn boundary is always a message boundary, and where two replies then abut it puts a `TurnBreak` between them: a hairline, no words, no colour. Made by the fold rather than sent by the server, because it is not something that happened -- it is the boundary between two things that did. `joinPages` puts one in at a page seam, which the fold never gets to see. The task notification is still what closes a task in `Status::Waiting`'s bookkeeping, and the registry lookup that recognises one this translator never saw start is what makes that work for a session adopted across a restart. Verified on the emulator: three replies, three rules, and nothing about the helpers anywhere in the parent. 170 server tests, 85 JVM tests, ktfmt, clippy, rustfmt and Android lint clean. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
12 KiB
Subagents
A session's subagents -- the helpers a Claude Code session starts through its
Task tool -- each get a transcript of their own, listed under the session's
card and readable in the same transcript view the session has. Designed
2026-09-05; the decisions Bryan has not yet reviewed are in DECISIONS.md.
What a subagent is here
A subagent is a second transcript owned by a session, in the same event model, with no process and no controls. It is not a session: it cannot be messaged, stopped or started, and it has no setup, model or usage of its own. Everything it shares with a session -- the transcript file format, the paging routes, the SSE stream, the phone's cache and rendering -- is reused by addressing, not by copying.
The CLI reports a subagent's messages on the parent's own stream-json
output, each carrying parent_tool_use_id = the id of the Task tool_use
that started it. Before this the translator dropped those lines
(subagent_events_are_not_duplicated_into_the_transcript); now it routes
them to that subagent's own translator and transcript. The parent's
transcript still shows only the Task call itself.
Storage
Under the session directory:
<session>/subagents/<tool_use_id>/meta.json {title, created}
<session>/subagents/<tool_use_id>/transcript.jsonl same SeqEvent lines as the session's
The id is the Task tool_use id (toolu_…), which is unique, stable across a
backend restart, and already the key everything on the parent side uses.
Only ids matching [A-Za-z0-9_-]+ are ever created or looked up, since the
id becomes a path.
The transcript's sequence numbers are its own, starting at 1. Transcript,
read_window, catch_up and read_after work on it unchanged.
Its path out: deleting the session deletes its directory, subagents included,
and POST /sessions/{id}/subagents/delete removes finished ones on their own
-- all or nothing, and refused while any named one is still running, since its
transcript is still being written to and its process is the session's to stop.
Lifecycle, as events in the subagent's transcript
-
Created on the first child line for an unseen parent id (or, when the parent Task call was seen, at that call). First lines written:
Status Running, thenUserMessage { text: <the Task's prompt> }when the prompt is known -- it genuinely is the subagent's first user turn. -
Every child line is translated by that subagent's own
Translator(one per subagent: tool ids are unique but streaming deltas are by content-block index, and parallel subagents interleave). -
What ends a subagent is the CLI's own task lifecycle, on top-level
systemlines that carry noparent_tool_use_id:task_started(task_id,tool_use_id,is_backgrounded, the prompt),task_progressrepeatedly, thentask_updated(patch.status, naming the task only) andtask_notification(tool_use_id,status, andsummary-- the agent's own report).translate_taskkeeps thetask_id -> tool_use_idmapping from the first so the update can be attributed, records the summary as the subagent's closing text, and writesStatus Exited. Acompletedupdate is deliberately not the end: its notification carries the summary and would otherwise land after the ending. Any other terminal status ends it from the update, since the failure to avoid is a subagent nothing ever finishes.The two rules this replaces were both wrong, in opposite directions. The parent's
tool_resultis not it: a backgrounded Task's arrives at launch ("Async agent launched..."), so ending there truncated a running agent's transcript at the moment it started. Nor is the subagent's ownend_turn: measured against 2.1.237 on 2026-09-06, a subagent's lines carry nostream_eventat all -- they are wholeuser/assistantlines with a nullstop_reason, noresultline is sent for one, and the sub's final report never appears as a child line -- so that rule could never fire and every subagent stayedrunningfor ever.ends_a_turnis kept as a second detector for a dialect that does say either, and must never be the only one again.Status Exitedeither way; the subagent's vocabulary has noIdleorWaiting, so the end-of-turn statusdispatchproduces for an ordinary session is dropped rather than written.The ending reaches the parent's transcript as nothing at all (2026-09-06). It was tried, and a row per finished subagent is a screenful of dividers about work the reader was not asking after; the closing report is this transcript's last line and here is where somebody reads it. What the parent gets a row for is a message a subagent genuinely sends it, which arrives by the peer path. The two lifecycle shapes are still handled once: whichever gets there first is the one that finds the task still open, and
finishbelow closes it. See PLAN.md's "Two turns must never be drawn as one".While any task is outstanding the session's turn ends in
Status Waitingrather thanIdle.Idlemeans "waiting for a person", and a session with a backgrounded subagent is not doing that. Two sources: the translator'sopen_tasks, andSubagents::any_open-- which is what covers a subagent launched before a backend restart adopted the session, whosetask_startedis behind the offset its stdout is read from. That second lookup is also what lets such a subagent's ending be recognised at all.A limit the account hits inside a subagent is hoisted to the session as well as recorded here, because
resume.rscan only schedule against a session, and a background subagent outliving its parent's turn is the ordinary case -- see PLAN.md's "A limit a subagent hits is the session's". -
A child line for a subagent that already finished reopens it (
Status Running) rather than being dropped: a background Task can be sent another message long after its first turn ended, and that is exactly what a further line for it means. Same transcript, same childTranslator, just picking back up. -
When the parent session's process exits (
Status Exitedon the session), every subagent stillRunninggetsStatus Exitedtoo: its process was the parent's. Read from the directory rather than from the live map, because one leftRunningby a previous run of the server is precisely the one nothing in this process has touched -- and it would otherwise readrunningagain every time its session was started.
A subagent that was mid-flight when the backend restarted keeps working:
the registry reopens the existing transcript on the next child line, and
the file continues its sequence -- the same reopening #4 describes, whether
what closed it was a restart or its own end_turn. If its turn ended while
the backend was down nothing recorded that until the next line arrives, so
its last status stays Running, which the list reports as unknown
rather than as running (see the wire shape) until then.
Title: the Task call's description input, then (<subagent_type>) when
one is given; falling back to the tool's name when the child arrives before
(or without) the parent call being seen.
Server layout
session/subagent.rs-- the registry:Subagents(per session, inShared),Subagent(itsTranscriptbehind a mutex plus abroadcast::Sender<SeqEvent>),record(id, event),start(id, title, prompt),finish(id),reopen(id),finish_all(),list()from disk, anddelete(ids)-- its path out. Drivers get anArc<Subagents>beside theirEventSink; llama ignores it.session/claude/translate.rs-- routes child lines by parent id, holds one childTranslatorper subagent, remembers pending Task calls' description/prompt/subagent_type.session/echo.rs--/subagent [n]: the test rig. Starts n (default 1) subagents at once, each named "helper k". Each writes the prompt as its user message, streams a few words of text, runs oneBashtool call, then finishes about three seconds after starting, and the parent's Task calls end when their subagent does. Three seconds so the running state can be seen on the phone.routes.rs-- four routes, in the doc table.
Wire shape
GET /sessions/{id} SessionInfo gains `subagents: N` (count, 0 when none)
GET /sessions same field on each row
GET /sessions/{id}/subagents [{id, title, status, created, lastActivity}], oldest first
GET /sessions/{id}/subagents/{sub}/transcript exactly the session transcript's query and answer
GET /sessions/{id}/subagents/{sub}/events?after=N exactly the session events stream
POST /sessions/{id}/subagents/delete {subagents} -> 204; refused whole if one is running
The delete is a batch rather than a DELETE per id for the reason the import
list's is: the phone deletes what a reader selected, and one request per row
means a batch can half-arrive, leaving the rows that were missed looking
exactly like rows nobody picked. Unlike an import delete it is local file
removal, so it is done by the time the reply is sent and there is no per-row
state to follow afterwards. What decides "running" is
Subagents::list's own rule, shared through routes::has_a_process so the
list and the delete cannot disagree about it.
status is the transcript's last Status event, serialised like a session's
(running, exited), except that a subagent whose session is not itself
running cannot be running: the list answers unknown for that one. A
subagent never reports waiting: that is a session's word for having
outstanding work of its own, and a subagent has none. The
phone words these as running, finished and unknown on the subcard.
The count on SessionInfo is a directory listing, so the list stays cheap.
The per-subagent status is only read when the list route is asked for.
Phone
- The subcards are ordered still running first, then most recently
active -- a display decision made on the phone (
subagentOrder), over the server's stable oldest-first answer. Two keys rather than activity alone because a subagent that is thinking reports nothing meanwhile and would sink below one that just finished. - Holding a subcard selects it, and several at a time, exactly as the
import list works, with the selection bar drawn inside the session's card
rather than at the bottom of the screen: this selection belongs to one card,
and a bar down there would read as acting on the whole list. One card at a
time -- picking a row in another card moves the selection rather than adding
to it, since one Delete is one request against one parent. Delete is
disabled, with the reason in words, while anything selected is still
running. Deleting confirms first, dims the rows it is acting on
(
BusyItem), and on success takes them out of that card and off the session's count without refetching anything else. The phone's cached copy of a deleted subagent's transcript is purged with it. SessionSummary.subagents: Int. A card with a non-zero count ends in an expander row -- a full-widthChevron(Pointing.Down)row that flips toPointing.Up-- collapsed by default. Expanding fetches/sessions/{id}/subagentsand draws oneOutlinedCardper subagent, indented inside the session card, the way dev-updater draws a project's components: title, then the status word and a relative time. The expansion state is per session id and survives a refresh of the list.- Tapping a subcard opens
Screen.Subagent, which isSessionScreenin read-only form: the same transcript, paging, cache, selection, images and status row, with the composer, the process button, the model picker, the files button, the settings cog and the usage bar left out. The header shows the subagent's title with the session's title beneath it. Back returns to the list. - Addressing:
fetchTranscript,EventStream,TranscriptSourceand the cache take a transcript address rather than a session id --sessions/{id}orsessions/{id}/subagents/{sub}-- so the cache nests a subagent's copy under its session's and the same code serves both.