A llama session was a chat box: no tools, a fixed model, no permission
mode, and a model name drawn as the path the file sits at. It now runs the
agent loop itself, which is what the pieces below all hang off.
Tools are `llama-server`'s own (`--tools all`), which that server both
publishes and runs -- `GET /tools` for the definitions, `POST /tools` to
call one. Web search is Exa's MCP server, reached from this backend rather
than from the machine serving the model: that is what llama.cpp's own web
UI does, and it puts the search on the machine with a route out instead of
the one with the GPU. `llama-server`'s `--mcp-servers-json` can only spawn
local commands, so using it would have meant a Node bridge on every
machine that serves a model.
Driving the loop is what makes the permission gate ours. Two modes,
`manual` and `bypassPermissions`, which is what the mechanism has: the web
UI asks before every call and remembers the tools you say "always" to. The
allowances fold back out of the transcript's own answers, so they survive
a restart and a model change without being stored anywhere else.
Also here, because tools made each of them matter:
- **Loading is a state.** A 12 GB model takes twenty seconds to reach
memory and refuses everything until it has; the session used to report
`running` for that whole time, and a message sent meanwhile came back as
an error. It is `loading` now, and the message waits.
- **The model can be changed.** A `llama-server` holds one model, so this
stops it and starts another. The conversation survives because it was
never in the server.
- **Models are named, not pathed.** `general.name` read out of the file
itself -- over ssh too, in the round trip the spawn was already making.
Where two models share a name the file name breaks the tie.
- **`-np 1`, and the MTP draft head where the file has one.** Measured on
the 27B here: 41.5 tok/s plain, 61.4 with `--spec-type draft-mtp` at one
slot, and 28 with it at four -- speculating against a split KV cache is
worse than not speculating. The flag is conditional because asking for a
head that is not there makes `llama-server` exit.
- **A refusal says what to do.** Tool results are thousands of tokens, so
an overrun context is now ordinary; it was "http status: 400" and is now
the server's own "exceeds the available context size, try increasing it".
`GET /machines/{id}/models` is gone: the provider models route answers the
same question, and two answers to one question is how a picker comes to
offer a model the spawn screen does not.
Verified end to end against real models: a tool call asked and allowed, an
Exa search, a shell command, a 27B loaded while a message waited on it, a
model switch mid-session, a second message queued behind a running turn,
and the whole of it again on a session running over ssh.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The same pass the server had, on the Kotlin side: comments restating what
the code says are gone, and the ones recording a measurement, a constraint
or an incident are kept but cut to a few lines each. 6540 comment lines to
5674, and 920 lines off the app.
Two doc comments had drifted onto the item above the one they describe --
`contextAfter`'s onto `sessionWorking` in Events.kt, and `UsageMonitor`'s
equivalent on the server was fixed in the previous commit. Each is back on
its own item, which is the only non-comment line this diff moves.
The comments are reflowed to the column limit at their own indentation:
several were written wide, and ktfmt re-wrapped them into lines holding a
single orphan word. `/tmp` script, not kept -- ktfmt is idempotent over the
result, which is the check.
Left alone deliberately: this codebase's remaining comment density is high
because the comments carry things the code cannot say -- what a null means,
what a number was measured against, which bug a guard exists for. Of the
238 one-line doc comments in the app, five were pure restatement of the
name and were removed; the rest each say something the signature does not.
ktfmtFormat, compileDebugKotlin, lintDebug and testDebugUnitTest pass;
cargo test (127), clippy --all-targets and fmt still clean.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A Rust backend that owns the sessions and an Android app that reads them.
The server spawns and adopts CLI processes, normalises everything they emit
into one event model, keeps the transcript, and serves it over pinned TLS on
a WireGuard interface; the phone streams that, replies, sends images, and
imports conversations the machine already has.
`AGENTS.md` is the working guide -- what runs where, what has been measured,
and the faults that were expensive to find. `PLAN.md` is the design record.
History before this point was squashed away. It was a personal project's
running commentary and carried a name and a couple of machine paths that
have no business in a public repository; the tree is what mattered and the
tree is here.
iris-aiandClaude Opus 5
irisandClaude Opus 5