Commit Graph
3 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
iris-aiandClaude Opus 5 bb5ac1a242 Draw a model's thinking, and what a reply cost to produce
A llama.cpp session's `reasoning_content` becomes `Event::Thinking` deltas
closed by an `Event::ThinkingDone` carrying the span the driver measured, and
the phone draws it as a card of its own: "Thinking" with the spinner a running
command has, then "Thought for 12.4s". Deliberately not a tool call, so a run
of calls cannot collapse the reasoning into "Called 6 tools"; the reasoning is
also kept out of the next prompt, which `conversation` already ignored.

`UsageDelta` gains `tokensPerSecond`, the provider's own figure or nothing --
llama.cpp reports `timings.predicted_per_second` and the coding CLIs report no
such thing -- and a finished reply carries a small line under it saying when it
was sent and, where there is one, how fast it came out: "3:00 PM · 149 tok/s".

The compact usage bar drops the provider's name for the window and puts its
length after the time left instead: "42% · 3h 20m left / 5h".

Three things that had to come with it: the transcript coalesces runs of
thinking deltas as it does reply deltas, so one block is one row of a page
rather than a page of its own; `joinPages` welds a block cut by a page boundary
(`healSplitThinking`), since the half with no ending spun for ever; and
`UsageDelta` now reaches the fold, which is what carries the rate to the reply.

Verified on the emulator against a real Qwen3-0.6B session and the echo rig's
new `/think [seconds]`: the spinner while it runs, "Thought for 1.4s" and
"2:54 PM · 149 tok/s" after, the reasoning on tapping the card, and the usage
bar reading "42% · 3h 19m left / 5h".

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-19 15:07:25 -04:00
iris-aiandClaude Opus 5 81ab564a09 Declare provider settings, and give the context figure a denominator
Two things a session could not say, and one it was saying wrongly.

**Every provider setting is reachable.** `-np 1`, the MTP draft depth, the
tool set, the sampling parameters -- most were hardcoded to what measured
best on this machine, which is right as a default and wrong as a constant:
the next machine has a different GPU and a different core count, and
nobody running this app can edit the source. `DriverKind::params` now
declares what a provider takes -- key, label, shape, what blank means, and
whether a change waits for a restart -- and the phone renders whatever
arrives, on the spawn form and in the session settings dialog. Adding a
setting to a driver is one entry in that table and no app change.
`POST /sessions/{id}/params` takes the whole map, so an absent key is the
instruction to unset; the sampling half applies at once and the session is
told in words which of the rest are waiting for a restart.

`tools` is one of them, because it is the biggest lever on a tight
context: the seven built-in definitions are ~1,300 tokens of every prompt
(2,191 against 887 with none). `"none"` omits the flag rather than passing
it on, since `--tools none` is `unknown tool "none"` and a server that
exits.

**The context figure has a denominator.** `Event::ContextWindow` carries
it, read from `llama-server`'s `/props` once the model is up -- the
measurement rather than the request, since a session that named no context
size gets the model's own. Neither coding CLI states its window, so those
keep the bare figure: "2,042" and "2,042 / 8,192" are deliberately
different-looking, and a missing ceiling is never drawn as a proportion of
an assumed one.

**And the numerator was wrong**, by the length of the last reply: it was
the prompt alone, so a five-word answer reported 2,042 against a slot
holding 2,355. It is the turn's total now, which matches `llama-server`'s
own `n_tokens` to within a token.

Two defects the review found, both of which would have shipped: changing
settings on a *stopped* session reported "no process running, so it can't
take new settings", when a stopped session is exactly when you would set
them for the next start; and `GET /tools` answers **403** rather than an
empty list on a server started without `--tools`, so reading it as a
failure made the no-tools session one that never started.

Verified against real models: settings spawned and changed live, the
restart note, a session with two tools and one with none, and the counter
checked against the server's own slot occupancy each time.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-19 13:58:08 -04:00
iris-aiandClaude Opus 5 ac476ab0c9 Give llama.cpp sessions tools, web search and a model picker
A llama session was a chat box: no tools, a fixed model, no permission
mode, and a model name drawn as the path the file sits at. It now runs the
agent loop itself, which is what the pieces below all hang off.

Tools are `llama-server`'s own (`--tools all`), which that server both
publishes and runs -- `GET /tools` for the definitions, `POST /tools` to
call one. Web search is Exa's MCP server, reached from this backend rather
than from the machine serving the model: that is what llama.cpp's own web
UI does, and it puts the search on the machine with a route out instead of
the one with the GPU. `llama-server`'s `--mcp-servers-json` can only spawn
local commands, so using it would have meant a Node bridge on every
machine that serves a model.

Driving the loop is what makes the permission gate ours. Two modes,
`manual` and `bypassPermissions`, which is what the mechanism has: the web
UI asks before every call and remembers the tools you say "always" to. The
allowances fold back out of the transcript's own answers, so they survive
a restart and a model change without being stored anywhere else.

Also here, because tools made each of them matter:

- **Loading is a state.** A 12 GB model takes twenty seconds to reach
  memory and refuses everything until it has; the session used to report
  `running` for that whole time, and a message sent meanwhile came back as
  an error. It is `loading` now, and the message waits.
- **The model can be changed.** A `llama-server` holds one model, so this
  stops it and starts another. The conversation survives because it was
  never in the server.
- **Models are named, not pathed.** `general.name` read out of the file
  itself -- over ssh too, in the round trip the spawn was already making.
  Where two models share a name the file name breaks the tie.
- **`-np 1`, and the MTP draft head where the file has one.** Measured on
  the 27B here: 41.5 tok/s plain, 61.4 with `--spec-type draft-mtp` at one
  slot, and 28 with it at four -- speculating against a split KV cache is
  worse than not speculating. The flag is conditional because asking for a
  head that is not there makes `llama-server` exit.
- **A refusal says what to do.** Tool results are thousands of tokens, so
  an overrun context is now ordinary; it was "http status: 400" and is now
  the server's own "exceeds the available context size, try increasing it".

`GET /machines/{id}/models` is gone: the provider models route answers the
same question, and two answers to one question is how a picker comes to
offer a model the spawn screen does not.

Verified end to end against real models: a tool call asked and allowed, an
Exa search, a shell command, a 27B loaded while a message waited on it, a
model switch mid-session, a second message queued behind a running turn,
and the whole of it again on a session running over ssh.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-19 08:11:49 -04:00