Picking an option marked nothing until the answer had crossed the tunnel,
been recorded and come back as an event, so the card sat unchanged for most
of a second after a tap. What the reader has picked is now the card's own
state and shows at once; a Submit at the foot sends every question the tool
is waiting on, greyed until all of them have an answer and a spinner while
the request is out.
Several questions are paged rather than stacked, with the count and a pair
of arrows on the right, because three questions with four described options
each is several screens and the reader scrolls past the one they are
answering to reach the button that sends it.
A permission ask keeps its single tap -- two bare words are not worth a
submit step -- and marks what was pressed until the request settles, so the
mark either stands on the recorded answer or goes away with the failure.
Chevron draws all four directions from one description of the shape, since
the pager needed two more of them.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Four things the transcript and the composer said badly.
**An answered question threw away the question.** It collapsed into
"Answered: Deny", which does not say that Allow was the alternative -- and
whether a tool was allowed or refused is what a reader comes back to that
row for. The options stay now and the one that was taken is marked, in the
same purple border that says "picked" while the question is still open, so
it is one appearance learned once rather than two renderings of one thing.
The buttons are disabled rather than removed, and state their own border
and label colour, because Material dims a disabled button's and that would
have taken the mark with it. Both places got it: the question card, and the
permission ask on a tool row, which had the same line.
An answer typed into **Other** matches no option, so nothing could mark it.
That one is still written out -- it is the state the marking cannot say.
**Memory notes were open.** A `<cc-memory>` note is not part of what was
said to the reader, it is a note about where a claim came from, and left
open it breaks a reply in half around a card. Closed like a tool call and a
peer message, with the file it came from still visible, since that is what
somebody scanning for "why does it think that" is looking for. Open-ness is
the screen's rather than the card's, so a note opened and scrolled past is
still open on the way back.
**Picking a slash command left its own suggestion up.** `/compact` is a
whole command and a prefix of itself, so the list stayed with the one row
already chosen -- something to dismiss, in front of the box it was about to
be sent from.
**A model switch warned when there was nothing to warn about.** The warning
is that a cache is dropped, so it needs there to be one: a session whose
process has exited has nothing holding a cache, and one reporting zero
context is holding nothing. Where the figure is *unknown* the fallback is
what it was -- whether anything has been said -- because unknown is not
nothing, and an import nobody has measured yet is exactly where the
conversation may be enormous.
A Rust backend that owns the sessions and an Android app that reads them.
The server spawns and adopts CLI processes, normalises everything they emit
into one event model, keeps the transcript, and serves it over pinned TLS on
a WireGuard interface; the phone streams that, replies, sends images, and
imports conversations the machine already has.
`AGENTS.md` is the working guide -- what runs where, what has been measured,
and the faults that were expensive to find. `PLAN.md` is the design record.
History before this point was squashed away. It was a personal project's
running commentary and carried a name and a couple of machine paths that
have no business in a public repository; the tree is what mattered and the
tree is here.
irisandClaude Opus 5