Commit Graph
10 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
iris-aiandClaude Opus 5 942edd6b31 List a session's background tasks above its subagents
The count beside the status said how much work was going and never what,
so "3 bg tasks" was a number with no way to find out what it was about.

Drivers now report the tasks themselves rather than a size:
`Driver::background_tasks` returns `Vec<BackgroundTask>` -- id, the
provider's own description, and a kind -- served by
`GET /sessions/{id}/background`. It is runtime state, never persisted,
and `null` is "nobody has said", which is what a session with no process
answers and what the panel says in words rather than drawing as an empty
list. `description` is optional because Codex names a background terminal
by a process id, and a number drawn as a name is worse than admitting
there is none.

Claude's `background_tasks_changed` entries turn out to be objects
carrying `task_id`, `task_type` and `description`, so each is read rather
than counted -- and an `ambient` one is now dropped from the list and the
count alike, on the CLI's own instruction: a live-update watcher is not
activity, and counting one left a session reading `waiting` with nothing
to wait for.

The phone draws them in the right-hand panel above the subagents,
collapsed to "2 bg tasks running" and pushing the subagents down when
opened. Both lists are items of one lazy column, so neither can run off
the panel, and the section is refetched whenever the live count moves --
a card for work that has finished is exactly the stale measurement the
count exists not to be.

Verified against the real Claude CLI (2.1.261): a backgrounded `sleep 120`
came back as `{"id":"br16327wr","description":"Sleep for 120 seconds",
"kind":"command"}`, and on the emulator against the echo rig the section
appeared, expanded, and dropped a card as its task finished.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-19 23:29:40 -04:00
iris-ai a9cfea89e5 Show Codex background task counts 2026-09-15 23:26:37 -04:00
iris 83b113ef0f Support Codex subagent transcripts 2026-09-13 00:41:59 -04:00
irisandClaude Opus 5 1bbb642973 Take subagent reports out of the main transcript, and separate turns with a rule
A row per finished background task is a screenful of dividers about work the
reader was not asking after, and one of them turned out to be a whole shell
command drawn as centred prose, because its words came from somewhere with no
reason to keep them short. `Event::TaskNote` is gone entirely, along with the
row that drew it. A subagent's closing report is recorded as that subagent's
own transcript's closing text and is read in the subcard, which is where it
was already going; what the parent gets a row for is a message a subagent
genuinely sends it, which arrives by the peer path and has had one all along.

What remains is the actual defect and the smallest thing that fixes it. The
fold still refuses to grow a settled reply, so a turn boundary is always a
message boundary, and where two replies then abut it puts a `TurnBreak`
between them: a hairline, no words, no colour. Made by the fold rather than
sent by the server, because it is not something that happened -- it is the
boundary between two things that did. `joinPages` puts one in at a page seam,
which the fold never gets to see.

The task notification is still what closes a task in `Status::Waiting`'s
bookkeeping, and the registry lookup that recognises one this translator never
saw start is what makes that work for a session adopted across a restart.

Verified on the emulator: three replies, three rules, and nothing about the
helpers anywhere in the parent. 170 server tests, 85 JVM tests, ktfmt, clippy,
rustfmt and Android lint clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-06 21:39:19 -04:00
irisandClaude Opus 5 ef1aad8776 Keep a subagent's words in its own transcript, and count the ones already running
Two corrections to the previous commit.

A subagent's closing report belongs in the subagent's transcript, which is
where it already is; drawing it as a card in the parent's put the same
paragraph in two places for a reader who did not ask for it. The row is a
divider now -- a boundary, which is what the transcript actually needed there
-- closed, saying only what reported and how it went. Opening it shows the
report anyway, since leaving the conversation to read one line has its own
cost, and a backgrounded command has no transcript of its own so this is the
only place its report exists at all: that one names itself from its summary
and has nothing left to open. `TranscriptDivider` grew a `trailing` slot for
the chevron rather than the row growing its own copy of the rules.

And the status was wrong for a session that was already running before the
update, which is every session when the backend is replaced under it.
Adoption picks a session's stdout back up from a recorded offset, so the
`task_started` lines for subagents launched earlier are behind it and the
translator never saw them -- it started with an empty set and reported `idle`
with a subagent plainly still working. `Subagents::any_open` reads the
directory instead, which is a measurement rather than bookkeeping and is right
for a session this process did not start. Both sources are kept and neither
subsumes the other: the translator's own set is the only thing that knows
about a backgrounded *command*, which has no subagent to be found. The same
pair decides whether an ending has already been reported, so a task that began
before the restart still gets its divider.

Echo's helpers now record their report as their own subagent's closing text,
the way the real driver does, so the fixture has the shape being tested.

Verified on the emulator: three dividers closed, one opened to its report, and
each reply drawn as its own message. 170 server tests, ktfmt, clippy, rustfmt,
Android lint and the JVM unit tests all clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-06 19:54:36 -04:00
irisandClaude Opus 5 5711c2568a Never run two turns into one, and say when a session waits on its own work
A turn started by something with no row of its own -- a subagent reporting
back, a peer message the CLI only owns up to at the end -- met the previous
reply with nothing between it, and the fold grew that reply rather than
starting a new one. Two answers were drawn as one paragraph, running together
mid-sentence with not even a space between them. The fold now refuses to grow
a settled reply, and `joinPages` carries the same rule across a page boundary.

The other half is the row. `Event::TaskNote` records a background task
reporting back -- a subagent that finished, or a backgrounded command -- with
its title, how it ended and what it said; `TaskNoteRow` draws it as a card,
since somebody said this, and its own row rather than an update to the Task
call's, which is above everything the session has said since. Reported once
however many of the CLI's two lifecycle shapes arrive.

`SessionStatus::Waiting` is a session whose own turn is over while work it
started is not. `Idle` means "waiting for a person" and this means the
opposite, so reporting it as idle sent a "finished" notification at the one
moment that was untrue. Drawn as "waiting" in `waitingColor`; the queue and
the held-command boundary release on either end-of-turn status, so a message
sent while a subagent runs is not held until it finishes.

And a usage limit the account hits inside a subagent now reaches the session
as well as the subagent's transcript. `resume.rs` can only schedule against a
session, and a background Task outliving its parent's turn is the ordinary
case, so auto-resume was doing nothing at all for it.

The status word and its colour were two `when`s on two screens, and the second
missed `waiting` silently; they are `sessionStatusWord`/`sessionStatusColour`
now. Echo's `/subagent n` reproduces the whole shape, staggered a second
apart. Verified on the emulator against the sandbox: 169 server tests, ktfmt,
clippy, rustfmt, Android lint and the JVM unit tests all clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-06 18:57:30 -04:00
irisandClaude Opus 5 74c07d687a End subagents on the CLI's own task lifecycle, and detect a limit two ways
Subagents were showing "running" long after they had finished. Measured
against 2.1.237 by running a session that launched one Task agent and
reading its stdout: a subagent's lines carry no `stream_event` at all --
they are whole `user`/`assistant` lines with a null `stop_reason` -- and no
`result` line is sent for one. So `ends_a_turn`, which watches for a raw
`message_delta` saying `end_turn`, could never fire for a subagent, and
nothing finished one until its session's process exited.

What the CLI does send is a task lifecycle, as top-level `system` lines:
`task_started` (with the tool_use id), `task_progress`, `task_updated`
(status, naming the task only) and `task_notification` (tool id, status, and
the agent's own summary). `translate_task` keeps the task -> tool mapping,
records the summary as the subagent's closing text -- the run showed its
child lines stop at its last tool_result, so without this a finished
subagent reads as stopping mid-tool -- and ends it. A `completed` update is
deliberately not the end, since its notification carries the summary; any
other terminal status is, because the failure to avoid is a subagent nothing
ever finishes. `ends_a_turn` stays as a second detector and must never be
the only one again. Verified by replaying the captured stream through the
server as a fake CLI: running, prompt, Bash call, output, report, exited.

`finish_all` now reads the directory rather than the live map, which is what
clears the ones already stuck: a subagent left running by an earlier run of
the server is exactly the one this process never touched, so it read
"running" again every time its session was started.

Auto-resume gets the same treatment on its own single point of failure. The
only thing that scheduled a resume was the CLI's error sentence at the end
of a failed turn; the CLI also sends `rate_limit_event` lines saying where
the account stands, and this server ignored them entirely. Both are read
now. Anything that is not an `allowed...` status counts as refused and is
logged if unfamiliar -- being wrong that way costs one question to the usage
meter, which is still what decides whether anything is sent, and being wrong
the other way is the feature silently not existing.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-06 13:29:23 -04:00
irisandClaude Opus 5 13d2d11c2d Order a session's subagents by activity, and delete finished ones by holding
The subcards were oldest first, which buried whatever is working now. They
are ordered on the phone -- still running first, then most recently active --
over the server's stable oldest-first answer, since presentation order is a
display decision and a subagent that is thinking reports nothing meanwhile.

Holding a subcard selects it and several at a time, the import list's gesture
and its confirmation, so selecting is learned once. The selection bar sits
inside the session's card rather than at the bottom of the screen: it belongs
to one card, and one Delete is one request against one parent, so picking a
row in another card moves the selection rather than adding to it. Delete is
disabled, with the reason in words, while anything selected is still running
-- its transcript is still being written to and its process is the session's
to stop, so the server refuses that batch outright.

`POST /sessions/{id}/subagents/delete` takes the batch and checks every id
before removing any, so a set naming a running one is left exactly as it was
rather than half-deleted. It is `Subagents::start`'s path out. What counts as
running is shared with the list route through `has_a_process`, so the two
cannot disagree. On success the phone takes those rows out of that one card
and off the session's count, purges its cached copies, and drops the
expansion when nothing is left -- nothing else is refetched.

Driven on the emulator against the sandbox with ui-trace's new hold-by-name:
selecting two, the dialog, the rows going, a running one holding Delete
disabled, and the expander leaving with the last subagent.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-06 13:10:21 -04:00
irisandClaude Fable 5.1 cf10b17c5b End a subagent on its own end_turn, not the parent's tool_result, and give the expander a touch-sized row
The Agent tool runs subagents in the background, so the parent's result
arrives at launch while the subagent works on for minutes; finishing on it
read a running agent as finished with a transcript cut off at launch. A
subagent now ends on its own message_delta end_turn, and a later line for a
finished one reopens it, since a background agent can be messaged again.

The card's expander row was only the chevron's height, so a tap for it
landed on the first subcard; it is the platform's 48dp minimum now.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-05 14:44:00 -04:00
irisandClaude Fable 5.1 9fa09b0af1 Show a session's subagents as subcards, each with a read-only transcript
A subagent is a second transcript owned by a session, in the same event
model, with no process and no controls. The claude translator routes lines
carrying parent_tool_use_id to a per-subagent translator and transcript
under <session>/subagents/<tool_use_id>; three routes expose the list, a
transcript page and the SSE stream. Echo grows /subagent [n] as the rig.

On the phone a card with subagents ends in a chevron expander, collapsed by
default, opening to outlined subcards styled like dev-updater's components;
a subcard opens SessionScreen in read-only form, addressed through
TranscriptAddress so paging, cache and stream are shared.

Design in SUBAGENTS.md; choices awaiting review in DECISIONS.md.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-05 13:41:15 -04:00