Report what a reply spent reading its prompt, and pin the clock right
`UsageDelta` gains `prefillMs`, llama-server's own `timings.prompt_ms`, so the footer under a finished reply is "read 9.5s · 50.3 tok/s · 3:00 PM". Prefill is the half of a turn that was invisible and is often the larger: measured on the 0.6B here, 1m 4s for the first turn after a model loads against 22ms for the next, whose prompt the server still had cached. The clock moves to the end of the line. Everything in front of it is a provider's own measurement, so a session on another provider has fewer of them or none, and a reader who has learned where the time is should not have to find it again because the model changed. The costs grow leftwards into the space instead, and a test asserts every shape of the line ends with the same thing. Verified on the emulator against a real llama session: three replies reading "read 1m 4s · 193 tok/s · 3:54 PM", "read 25ms · 308 tok/s · 3:54 PM" and "read 22ms · 194 tok/s · 3:54 PM", with the clock in one column. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
b660905098
commit
369b8f7e52
14 files changed
+135
-42
No files matched your search
@@ -894,6 +894,8 @@ impl EchoDriver {
|
||||
tokens_per_second: Some(streaming.elapsed().as_secs_f64())
|
||||
.filter(|elapsed| *elapsed > 0.0)
|
||||
.map(|elapsed| words as f64 / elapsed),
|
||||
// Nothing to read: this driver has no prompt to process.
|
||||
prefill_ms: None,
|
||||
});
|
||||
finish();
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user