`draw_inner` took an answer from `try_reuse`, which checks only whether the
widget itself is marked, where `retained_answer` beside it also refused one
while anything the widget read a size from was dirty. A widget whose drawing
happened to be reusable therefore handed back the answer it gave before that
descendant changed.
Nothing puts that right afterwards. The comparison that tells a reader its
child's answer moved is in `redraw`, and a widget settled inside its parent's
own draw never goes through it -- the placing ask redraws the subtree, the
descendant's mark is cleared there, and the parent keeps a number the tree no
longer agrees with. So the check is not the optimization its comment claimed;
it is what makes the answer an answer, and both retained routes are answers,
so it is asked once in `draw_inner` rather than by one of them.
Found by the generated oracle at seed 564, depth 6, `shuffle-every-other`,
while reading a child's report as a fraction of the containing widget: that
reading lets a span overflow itself, which makes the two asks' boxes differ
far enough for the placing one to redraw.
Twenty-five rig work counters are unchanged on `cold`, `repaint`, `scroll`,
`resize` and `size`; `many` makes 18 fewer reuse attempts, 17 of which
already reported "dirty". Both long fuzzers green.
iris-ai
0e0d4af326